Back to Home

Orbit vs GitHub Copilot

Autocomplete vs Autonomous Agents. Two fundamentally different approaches to AI-assisted development.


At a Glance

GitHub Copilot

The original AI coding assistant. Works as an extension in your existing IDE, suggesting code completions as you type. You're still the driver—Copilot is your very smart autocomplete.

Orbit

Agent-first UDE (Unified Development Environment). You describe what you want to build. AI agents plan, write, and iterate autonomously. You're the director, not the typist.


Feature Comparison

Approach

Copilot

Autocomplete (AI suggests)

Orbit

Agent-first (AI executes)

Integration

Copilot

IDE extension

Orbit

Standalone UDE

AI Model

Copilot

OpenAI Codex / GPT-4

Orbit

Multi-model (Claude, GPT, Gemini)

Workflow

Copilot

Type → AI suggests

Orbit

Describe → AI builds

Target user

Copilot

Developers in existing IDEs

Orbit

Developers, PMs, vibe coders

Learning curve

Copilot

Minimal (works as you type)

Orbit

New paradigm (directing agents)

Task scope

Copilot

Line-by-line suggestions

Orbit

Multi-file features

Built-in browser

Copilot

No

Orbit

Yes (full Chromium + DevTools)

Built-in deployment

Copilot

No

Orbit

Yes

Setup required

Copilot

Install extension + API key

Orbit

None (1-click everything)

Pricing

Copilot

$10/mo individual, $19/mo business

Orbit

Free during beta

Philosophy

Copilot

Augment your typing

Orbit

Delegate to agents


The Fundamental Difference

This isn't about which tool has more features. It's about two fundamentally different philosophies of how AI should assist software development.

Copilot: Augmented Typing

  • You write code, Copilot suggests completions
  • You're still the driver
  • AI is a very smart autocomplete
  • Speeds up what you already know how to do

Orbit: Delegated Execution

  • You describe what you want to build
  • AI agents plan, write, test, iterate
  • You're the director, AI is the team
  • Builds things you couldn't code yourself

Think of it this way: Copilot makes you a faster coder. Orbit makes coding optional.


What is GitHub Copilot?

GitHub Copilot is the original AI coding assistant, launched in 2021. It pioneered the concept of AI-powered code completion and now has over 1 million paying users.

How it works:

  • Installs as an extension in VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, and other IDEs
  • Suggests code completions as you type, using context from your file
  • Copilot Chat adds conversational AI for explaining code and answering questions
  • Copilot Workspace (preview) adds more autonomous capabilities
  • Trained on billions of lines of code from GitHub repositories

Copilot is the most widely-adopted AI coding tool, with strong enterprise features including compliance controls and audit logs.


Where Copilot Shines

Copilot has genuine strengths that have made it the market leader:

  • Works in your existing IDE: No workflow change required—just install and go
  • Excellent for line-by-line coding: Superb autocomplete for functions, boilerplate, and patterns
  • Massive training data: Learned from all of GitHub's public repositories
  • Enterprise-ready: SOC 2 compliance, audit logs, organization management
  • Battle-tested: Millions of developers have used it across countless projects
  • Copilot Chat: Conversational interface for explaining code and debugging

If you want to speed up your existing coding workflow with minimal change, Copilot is the safe, proven choice.


Where Orbit is Different

Orbit isn't trying to be a better Copilot. It's asking a different question: what if AI didn't just assist your coding—what if it did the coding?

  • Agent-first architecture: AI agents handle entire features, not just line completions
  • Multi-model flexibility: Choose Claude, GPT, Gemini, or others—use the best model per task
  • Truly unified: Browser, terminal, editor, chat, canvas, notes—all in one window
  • Zero config: Docker, Git, deployment all work with one click
  • Built for everyone: PMs, founders, vibe coders—not just experienced developers
  • Purpose-built: Designed from scratch for AI-native workflows, not bolted onto an IDE

The shift is from "AI helps me code faster" to "AI builds what I describe." It's a different paradigm entirely.

Read more: Why IDEs Are Dying →


Which Should You Choose?

Choose Copilot if:

  • You have an existing workflow in VS Code, JetBrains, or another IDE
  • You're speeding up code you already know how to write
  • You need enterprise compliance and audit features
  • You want the most battle-tested, widely-adopted option
  • You prefer minimal workflow change—just better autocomplete

Choose Orbit if:

  • You're building something new from scratch
  • You want to describe features and have AI build them
  • You're a founder, PM, or vibe coder
  • You want multi-model flexibility (Claude, GPT, Gemini)
  • You prefer autonomous agents over autocomplete
  • You hate configuration and setup

Can You Use Both?

Absolutely. They solve different problems:

  • Use Copilot when you're working in existing codebases where you need quick inline completions
  • Use Orbit when you're starting new projects or want AI agents to handle larger tasks
  • Many developers use autocomplete tools for day-to-day coding and agent-based tools for bigger builds

The question isn't which is "better"—it's which approach fits the work you're doing right now.


The Verdict

GitHub Copilot and Orbit represent two generations of AI-assisted development.

Copilot is the evolution of typing—AI that makes you faster at writing code. It's proven, enterprise-ready, and works with your existing tools.

Orbit is a new paradigm—AI that writes the code while you direct. It's built for a future where describing intent matters more than typing syntax.

The trend is clear: AI is moving from assistance to execution. Copilot started this shift. Orbit is where it's going.

Learn more: UDEs vs IDEs →



Try Agent-First Development

Free during beta. See what it's like when AI builds while you direct.

Ready to try agent-first development?

Join thousands of builders who've moved from autocomplete to autonomous agents.