Back to Home

7 Best Cursor Alternatives in 2025

AI code editors and agent-first tools compared

Looking for Cursor alternatives? Whether you want a lower price point, different AI models, open-source options, or a completely different approach to AI-assisted development, there are strong options in 2025. Here's the complete breakdown.


Quick Comparison

Orbit

Featured

Type

Agent-first UDE

Pricing

Free (beta)

Best For

Founders, vibe coders, building from scratch

Windsurf

Type

AI IDE

Pricing

Free / $15 Pro

Best For

Cursor alternative at lower price

GitHub Copilot

Type

IDE Extension

Pricing

$10-19/mo

Best For

Existing IDE users, enterprise

Cline

Type

Open Source

Pricing

Free + API costs

Best For

Privacy-conscious, self-hosted

Continue

Type

Open Source

Pricing

Free

Best For

Local models, customization

Bolt.new

Type

Web-based

Pricing

Free tier

Best For

Quick prototypes, web apps

Lovable

Type

Vibe coding

Pricing

Usage-based

Best For

Non-technical builders


#1 PickFree during beta

Orbit — Agent-First UDE

Not another AI code editor. A completely different approach to building software.

Traditional (Cursor)

You code, AI assists

Write code → Get suggestions → Accept/reject → Repeat

Agent-First (Orbit)

You direct, AI builds

Describe what you want → AI agents build it → Review & refine

Multi-Model

Claude, GPT, Gemini

All-in-One

Editor + Browser + Deploy

Zero Config

Start instantly

Purpose-Built

Not a VS Code fork

Best for: Founders, vibe coders, non-developers
Pricing: Free during beta

Windsurf — Budget-Friendly Cursor Alternative

Built by Codeium, Windsurf is a VS Code fork with deep AI integration. It offers a similar experience to Cursor at a lower price point, with features like Cascade (agentic coding) and AI Flows (automated workflows).

Pros

  • Lower price than Cursor ($15 vs $20/mo)
  • Generous free tier (25 credits/month)
  • Familiar VS Code experience
  • Cascade handles multi-file edits well

Cons

  • Locked to Codeium's models
  • Newer, less mature than Cursor
  • Still IDE-based (not agent-first)

Pricing: Free tier, Pro $15/month

Best for: Developers who want a Cursor-like experience at a lower price. See Orbit vs Windsurf comparison →


GitHub Copilot — The Enterprise Standard

The original AI coding assistant with over 1 million users. Works as an extension in your existing IDE (VS Code, JetBrains, etc.). Battle-tested and enterprise-ready with compliance features.

Pros

  • Works in your existing IDE
  • Most battle-tested option
  • Enterprise compliance features
  • Trained on all of GitHub
  • Copilot Chat for conversations

Cons

  • Autocomplete-focused (not agentic)
  • Locked to OpenAI models
  • Extension, not standalone

Pricing: $10/month individual, $19/month business

Best for: Enterprise users and developers who want minimal workflow change. See Orbit vs Copilot comparison →


Cline — Open-Source Claude Coding

Formerly known as Claude Dev, Cline is an open-source VS Code extension that gives you agentic coding capabilities using your own API keys. Full transparency and control over your AI coding assistant.

Pros

  • Completely open-source
  • Bring your own API keys
  • Full control and transparency
  • Active community development

Cons

  • Requires API key management
  • DIY setup and configuration
  • API costs can add up

Pricing: Free (pay for API usage)

Best for: Privacy-conscious developers who want full control and transparency.


Continue — Local-First AI Coding

An open-source AI coding assistant that works with local models (via Ollama) or cloud providers. Highly customizable with support for custom prompts, context providers, and slash commands.

Pros

  • Fully open-source
  • Local model support (Ollama)
  • Highly customizable
  • Privacy-first option

Cons

  • More setup required
  • Local models need good hardware
  • Less polished than commercial options

Pricing: Free

Best for: Privacy advocates and developers who want local-first AI with full customization.


Bolt.new — Instant Web Apps

Built by StackBlitz, Bolt.new lets you describe an app and get a working full-stack application instantly in your browser. No local setup required— everything runs in WebContainers.

Pros

  • Zero local setup
  • Instant live preview
  • Great for quick prototypes
  • Shareable URLs

Cons

  • Web-only (no native apps)
  • Less control than local development
  • Can get expensive with usage

Pricing: Free tier, paid plans for more usage

Best for: Quick prototypes and web-based development without local setup. See Orbit vs Bolt comparison →


Lovable — Vibe Coding for Non-Developers

A vibe coding platform designed for non-technical users. Describe what you want in natural language and get working applications. Very beginner-friendly with a focus on design-forward output.

Pros

  • Extremely beginner-friendly
  • Fast results from descriptions
  • Good design defaults
  • No coding knowledge required

Cons

  • Less control for developers
  • Platform lock-in concerns
  • Usage-based pricing can add up

Pricing: Usage-based

Best for: Non-technical founders and complete beginners who want fast results.


How to Choose Your Cursor Alternative

The best choice depends on what you're looking for:

Want agent-first approach? → Orbit
Want cheaper Cursor? → Windsurf
Want enterprise/stable? → GitHub Copilot
Want open-source? → Cline or Continue
Want web-based/quick? → Bolt.new
Want no-code friendly? → Lovable

Why People Look for Cursor Alternatives

  • Pricing concerns: $20/month adds up, especially for teams
  • Model flexibility: Want to use Claude, Gemini, or local models instead of just OpenAI
  • Agentic features: Looking for AI that does more than suggest—AI that builds
  • Open-source preference: Want transparency and control over their tools
  • Different paradigm: Exploring agent-first vs autocomplete approaches

The Bottom Line

Cursor is an excellent tool, but it's not the only option. The AI coding space is evolving rapidly, and 2025 brings genuine alternatives for every use case and budget.

The biggest shift is from AI-assisted coding (Cursor, Copilot) to agent-first development (Orbit). Instead of AI helping you type faster, agents handle entire features while you direct. It's a different paradigm that's worth exploring.

The best choice depends on your workflow, budget, and how you want to work with AI. Many developers use multiple tools—autocomplete for quick edits, agents for bigger builds.


Ready to try the agent-first approach?

Orbit is free during beta. See what it's like when AI builds while you direct.